And He’s #1 in New Hampshire WHY?!?
January 7, 2008 by Jolly Roger
I’m sorry for my long absence. I’ve had a horrible sinus infection that got in my ears and made doing anything on a computer agony. But I’m back, and I’m mad
Are New Hampshire voters actually paying attention to what McCavein is saying, or are they just that disgusted with the rest of the pack?
I will say this-if the intent was to make Huck, Romney, or even Rudy look like reasonable alternatives, then McCavein is succeeding. It’s hard to imagine why a guy who spent 5 years in a prison because of a war for nothing would think that another war for nothing is a good thing, but Johnny says that’s his position.
I used to think he was just a shameless panderer, but I confess now that I’m not sure I have him pegged right. Perhaps he’s clinically insane, or exhibiting the signs of dementia. Not being schooled in the medical or psychiatric professions, I cannot say for sure what McCavein’s deal is.
Being a human being with reasonable deductive abilities, I think it is OK for me to say with a great deal of confidence that “John the Baptist” McCavein is bat-shit crazy. But don’t take my word for it. He’ll tell you himself.
According to presidential candidate John McCain, only the handling of the Iraq war was a mistake — not the war itself.
“It’s not American presence that bothers the American people, it’s American causalities,” said McCain in an interview with Tim Russert on NBC’s “Meet The Press” on Sunday.
The validity of this conjecture is questionable, as fifty-nine percent of Americans say the U.S. should “stick to a withdrawal timetable.” But McCain said in a recent New Hampshire debate — and reasserted as much on Sunday — that as long as Americans aren’t dying, he sees nothing wrong with US troops staying as many as 100 years in Iraq.
“What I believe we can achieve is a reduction in casualties to the point where the Iraqis are doing the fighting and dying [and] we’re supporting them,” McCain said.
He said it would be “hard to say” how many U.S. troops would need to stay in Iraq, but assured that they would be “out of harm’s way.”
When Russert asked him if, like Bush, McCain would have supported the Iraq war even if no weapons of mass destruction were believed present in Iraq, McCain seemed to dismiss the question as irrelevant.
“If frogs had wings … we can talk about lots of hypotheticals,” he said. “The point is if we had done it right, you and I wouldn’t even be discussing it now.”
Frogs may not have wings, but bats do.










McCain has history there with the right. He won handily in 04 over Bush. I lived in Boston during the 70’s and spent quite a bit of time in NH, I found the people stubborn to a fault when it comes to their politics.
So Johnny knows what sells there.
McCavein is a miserable old wretch who recently said he would have invaded Iraq WMD’S or not.
The mindless illusions of a deranged old man will bring this country down completely if he is installed.