Comments on: It’s Not an Insurgency http://sirenschronicles.com/2008/04/16/its-not-an-insurgency/ "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."-Teddy Roosevelt Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:50:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Dusty http://sirenschronicles.com/2008/04/16/its-not-an-insurgency/#comment-4705 Dusty Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:51:18 +0000 http://sirenschronicles.com/2008/04/16/its-not-an-insurgency/#comment-4705 BushCo has to be leaving this mess for the next President..he knows the people aren't stupid..his rating is abysmal..lowest in history as of this week. This administration will be judged the worst in our history..there is no way out of that one Dez..I firmly believe that with all my heart. The war crimes committed, the removal of our rights under the Consitution, all these things will be judged and they will be lacking. BushCo has to be leaving this mess for the next President..he knows the people aren’t stupid..his rating is abysmal..lowest in history as of this week.

This administration will be judged the worst in our history..there is no way out of that one Dez..I firmly believe that with all my heart. The war crimes committed, the removal of our rights under the Consitution, all these things will be judged and they will be lacking.

]]> By: Dizzy Dezzi http://sirenschronicles.com/2008/04/16/its-not-an-insurgency/#comment-4696 Dizzy Dezzi Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:41:32 +0000 http://sirenschronicles.com/2008/04/16/its-not-an-insurgency/#comment-4696 Giving the benefit of the doubt, I think they are still talking all hearts and flowers about Iraq for a few reasons: 1) If the sheeple believe the war is going "well" under the current Republican president, they might be willing to elect another Republican president who will continue the current policy, ignoring the bad news that usually, only the military families know about (you always hear about the deaths, you never hear about the severely injured). 2) Keep stalling, keep stalling, keep stalling until the next president (regardless of party) takes over and then let him inherit this colossal bloody mess. 3) To keep Bush (and Cheney) from losing face and going down in history as the guys who lost the "second" Iraq war/aka the "second" American quagmire. No matter what, so long as they say to the world things are going great and they can leave office without people looking too closely, then it won't be them who "lost" the war, it will be the next president and regardless of what that next president does in their administration, pro-War foes will poke and poke and poke at the "look, Presidint so and so made us lose the war in Iraq that we was winning under preziditz bush" 4) They are making too much money for their "retirement plans" they have no intention of giving up the Iraq cash cow. Maybe the real surprise will be true and massive troop withdrawals right after November in a vain attempt to scrape together a legacy for Bush...(snort)...jus' kidding. <em>Dizzy Dezzi's last blog post..<a href='http://dizzydayz.blogspot.com/2008/04/your-morning-cuppa-dizzy_16.html' rel="nofollow">Your Morning Cuppa Dizzy</a></em> Giving the benefit of the doubt, I think they are still talking all hearts and flowers about Iraq for a few reasons:
1) If the sheeple believe the war is going “well” under the current Republican president, they might be willing to elect another Republican president who will continue the current policy, ignoring the bad news that usually, only the military families know about (you always hear about the deaths, you never hear about the severely injured).
2) Keep stalling, keep stalling, keep stalling until the next president (regardless of party) takes over and then let him inherit this colossal bloody mess.
3) To keep Bush (and Cheney) from losing face and going down in history as the guys who lost the “second” Iraq war/aka the “second” American quagmire. No matter what, so long as they say to the world things are going great and they can leave office without people looking too closely, then it won’t be them who “lost” the war, it will be the next president and regardless of what that next president does in their administration, pro-War foes will poke and poke and poke at the “look, Presidint so and so made us lose the war in Iraq that we was winning under preziditz bush”
4) They are making too much money for their “retirement plans” they have no intention of giving up the Iraq cash cow. Maybe the real surprise will be true and massive troop withdrawals right after November in a vain attempt to scrape together a legacy for Bush…(snort)…jus’ kidding.

Dizzy Dezzi’s last blog post..Your Morning Cuppa Dizzy

]]>