John Yoo, the Protest and the issue of his teaching at Berkeley
May 19, 2008 by Dusty
This past Saturday, May 17th, the UC Berkley Law School held it’s graduation ceremony. It was attended by over 50 active and very vocal protesters. Most were dressed in prison orange and many were holding signs or reenacting various Guantanamo torture scenes for the graduates and their family members.
As someone that opposes torture as described in the Geneva Convention, Common Article 3, I find Yoo’s logic frightening and disgusting. My motto when it comes to treating people is this: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Its friggin simple really, I don’t want American military personnel to be tortured so why in the blue hell would I accept my own government doing it, with obvious glee in some cases. But I digress.
Saturday’s protest was well-planned and frankly well funded. They flew a plane continuously over the proceedings with a sign that read:
Shame on Yoo & UC-End Torture
Yoo did not attend the ceremony. He had announced this previously as a matter of fact, but many of the protesters said it didn’t matter, it was still a great opportunity to get their message out. I support them on that issue.
What I have a problem with, besides Yoo’s involvement in BushCo’s administration is his teaching our next generation of lawyers. I hope, indeed I pray, that all of his students abhor him and what he stands for; a neoconservative individual with very few morals and incredibly low standards on the issues of equality, due process and human rights.
Yet, the man has every right to teach, he is after all, tenured. There is also another reason he should be allowed to teach, as much as it pains me to say; Academic Freedom. Christopher Edley, the Dean of Berkley’s Law School is an honorable man. He has worked for presidents and he currently advises Obama. His politics are liberal and yet his memo addressing the Yoo teaching issue is very spot-on when it comes to the basic tenant of why Yoo should be allowed to continue teaching at Berkley. A school he has been teaching at since 1993 and received tenure in 1999. From Dean Edley’s infamous memo on John Yoo:
There are important questions about the content of the Yoo memoranda, about tortured definitions of “torture,” about how he and his colleagues conceived their role as lawyers, and about whether and when the Commander in Chief is subject to domestic statutes and international law. We press our students to grapple with these matters, and in the legal literature Professor Yoo and his critics do battle. One can oppose and even condemn an idea, but I do not believe that in a university we can fearfully refuse to look at it. That would not be the best way to educate, nor a promising way to seek deeper understanding in a world of continual, strange revolutions.
Yoo also enjoys First Amendment rights and the most ironic of all, Due Process as well. So while we really have no conceivable reason to conclude he should be unceremoniously dumped at UC Berkley, we have every reason to wish some judge and jury somewhere would convict him and his BushCo employers of high crimes and misdemeanors. Only then could Mr. You be run out of Berkley’s Law School on a proverbial rail. Again from Dean Edley’s memo:
Assuming one believes as I do that Professor Yoo offered bad ideas and even worse advice during his government service, that judgment alone would not warrant dismissal or even a potentially chilling inquiry. As a legal matter, the test here is the relevant excerpt from the “General University Policy Regarding Academic Appointees,” adopted for the 10-campus University of California by both the system-wide Academic Senate and the Board of Regents:
Types of unacceptable conduct: … Commission of a criminal act which has led to conviction in a court of law and which clearly demonstrates unfitness to continue as a member of the faculty. [Academic Personnel Manual sec. 015]
There, in a nutshell, is what would be needed by the Dean to dump John Yoo. So the goal should be, for everyone that despises torture, to see Mr. Yoo tried and convicted in a court of law somewhere on our planet.
And frankly, I think getting canned by UC Berkley would be the least of Mr. Yoo’s problems if the situation named above finally happened to his smarmy ass. Only then will UC Berkley be free to fire that fuckwit and remove law students from his sphere of influence.
Crossposted at UnCapitalist Journal
Sphere: Related Content








John Yoo is responsible for the lives of some and the lifetime disability of others. That is enough for me to fire him as a teacher.
The law may or may not catch up to him, but what does he show of an understanding of the law, American law, if he believes in torture and in an imperialist president? Is he teaching American law, or is he making things up, or is he teaching law from his country of origin?
How can we possibly expect him to grade fairly when he reasons that the law can be bent for a chosen few? What does he do when a student hits his nerve? He does not reason that others have freedom and rights when it comes to his side being hurt. So, how is he going to grade a student who hits a nerve but is correct? John Yoo does not seem to have that sort of reasoning, which by the way, seems to me to be the first basic thing that a person needs to know if practicing or teaching American law. John Yoo’s type of thinking says that defense lawyers are appropriate only if he or his people are not threatened.
This man is the black core of the darkest hour in American government. How can he teach and practice blind justice? He is not able.
As I say in the post, Dean Edley is a very liberal-oriented individual and he would probably like nothing better than to shit-can Yoo. Teaching at one of the most prestigious colleges on the westcoast is a feather in Yoo’s cap.
The man is responsible for the commission of war crimes by the Bush Administration as far as I am concerned. His torture memos will hopefully one day help the next adminstration hold everyone in Bushco responsible for a myriad of offenses.
Thank you for leaving us your thoughts on this.