States Secrets Privilege can’t be used for rendition case.
April 30, 2009 by Dusty
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has told Eric Holder NO on using the states secret privilege argument in the rendition case against a Boeing subsidiary.
Bet that just ruined his day! From the Jurist writeup linked above:
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday that the state secrets privilege does not bar a lawsuit against a company that allegedly provided logistical support for CIA rendition flights. Plaintiffs Binyam Mohamed, Abou Elkassim Britel, Ahmed Agiza, Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah, and Bisher al-Rawi allege that Jeppesen Dataplan, a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing, knowingly supported direct flights to secret CIA prisons, facilitating the torture and mistreatment of US detainees. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) intervened in 2007 before the defendant filed an answer, arguing that the lawsuit posed a risk to national security. In overturning the lower court’s dismissal of the case, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the state secret privilege must be based on actual evidence in the case, not on what evidence might be involved in the case:
Concluding that the subject matter of this lawsuit is not a state secret because it is not predicated on the existence of a secret agreement between plaintiffs and the Executive, and recognizing that our limited inquiry under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) precludes prospective consideration of hypothetical evidence, we reverse and remand.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which filed the suit on plaintiffs’ behalf, welcomed [press release] Tuesday’s ruling, saying, “[t]his historic decision marks the beginning, not the end, of this litigation.”
ACLU is batting a thousand lately..and I do love it! 
Crossposted at Leftwing Nutjob.
Sphere: Related ContentRelated posts:
- 9th circuit tells neocon homophobes to take a hike. From Jurist: A three-judge panel of the US Court of...
- Federal Judge rules Prop 8 case can proceed From Jurist: A federal judge on Wednesday refused to dismiss...
- 9th Circuit prohibits logging in National Forest’s Bush of course overturned a Clinton rule and allowed logging...
- SCOTUS refuses to hear medical marijuana challenges by San Diego and San Bernadino counties. Thank Gawd for small miracles! From FindLaw: The Supreme Court...
- Blurring the lines between right and wrong. The Big O is doing a standup job of blurring...
I think you may get your way, Dusty, but ultimately, we’ll all be sorry, a lot sorrier than we are now. No crystal ball here, just my gut feeling. I’ll bet you a dollar I’m right and let’s give it the two years it’s going to take for the ugly, may I say butt ugly. resolution.
Robb, I personally feel that absolute power is a bad precedence. It erodes our civil rights and it takes due process and tosses it out the window.
Whether we are going to be ’sorry’ doesn’t matter in the big picture because no ever says fighting for whats right is an easy job, or makes life easier for everyone.
Miranda rights are a pain in the ass, but part of our due process and our civil rights. There are lots of laws that make it harder on us as a country or our law enforcement community to do their jobs.
All true, but we’re still going to be sorry we’re opening this can of worms. Get your dollar out.
Oh, I’m not even counting the part where we’re all being tortured, if I may use that term lightly, by having this be the center of our attention for the next two years. It’s already up to my lower lip right now.